I know that if I try to make this entry any more than it is I will ruin it.
Today I felt like starting
wow, you are the first stranger to write a textwall to me
no longer writing in the third person
we want to live the knowledge too live the content
ahnaf is it worth reading all those books
think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now
this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet
that looks like my instagram account
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given
i understand
so at the end
propensity within someone
all that is to say
sorry i am texting like a slav
i dont understand magnetisation
isaac newton
its good short few pages
plato
like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them
amazing hopefully this was all legible and frankly i might be going very off board but you seemed interesting
you cannot feed someone truth
so the method has to be autonomous
i really havent
ahnaf abrar
idk
i hadn't considered this pedagogically or as a kind of personal knowledge management system (puke) at all but i suppose it is both of those things
lol
i guess imagine a multimedia obsidian or notion that behaves according to some insane arcane rules that you can't ever really determine
god "possessing" artists "possessing" people
which magnetises chains of pins
magnetisation/form
god being the centre magnet