its performative

whats your name?

like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them

plato

its good

magnetisation basically means the induction of divine form unto you

okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models

you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak

was it worth it

you cannot feed someone truth

we can only engage in such a way

so magnetisation means the divine spirit acting thru u endowing you with its qualities

magnetisation/form

its good

we need to be deconstructing our identities

plato

mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation

i was tempted to lie about my name

i love it here

what do you think my name is

no i haven't really read anything

autonomy of learning

sorry i am texting like a slav

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

thank you

and the fake qualifier

abrar?

bro i read nothing in my life

isaac

this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet

like magnets

division of reality is straying away from it

ion

so the method has to be autonomous

ahnaf is it worth reading all those books

the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book

i struggle with building a personal technical architecture for storing media, both curation and creation. instead i bookmark everything