as in
a version of this existed for a few months last year but it was static. it was HTML with writing and pictures and videos and sounds. i had this feeling that the code should be as important as the content, that structurally each piece in relation to each other piece shouldn't change, that the mazelike quality should emerge from me intricately arranging paths through it. like classic hypertext
have you read
okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models
something for the future. something to look at when this is more. I've been thinking about... whatever
you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak
propensity within someone
magnetisation/form
something religious, a kind of complex,
it will get lighter
, something washing, cleansing, revealing, etc.this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet
you cannot feed someone truth
we can only engage in such a way
my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given
so the method has to be autonomous
13 |
|
|
H |
|
|
. . . . |
. . . . |
. . . . |
. . . . |
|
mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation
somewhere between instagram and chatgpt
there's probably something in that, but I don't feel like thinking about it too much yet.
all that is to say
i believe search always should be immersive, because whatever is pre planned and non consuming (what you are looking for is total engulfment by the spectre of the real), a joyous intensity, a flow of virtue
i hope ai fixes this with the cessation of interfaces and walls
i am quite confused, not quite getting the idea of it
wow, you are the first stranger to write a textwall to me