...

i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate

all that is to say

i want to do that too

you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak

magnetisation basically means the induction of divine form unto you

was it worth it

isaac

i did until you asked which kind of gave it away

we need to be deconstructing our identities

i understand

this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet

i really havent

like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them

i love it here

its performative

god being the centre magnet

magnetisation/form

bro i read nothing in my life

yeah people dont get it they assume its ahnaf

to work in time to get to the timeless, perfection thru chaos

propensity within someone

mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation

This is a website run by a narcissist who can't produce anything without the hope that it is seen and loved but can't act due to the fear of it being seen and hated. They immediately feel the need to ask Jack GPT to define whatever this feeling is in the hope that understanding it will mean control over it and control over it will mean that they can stop it.

feel you

like magnets

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

thank you

but it is in my head and am i compelled to realise it, so it is my silmarillion, my tempelos

magnetises a pin