its performative
mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation
i understand
like first name
not their contents
ahnaf is it worth reading all those books
and the fake qualifier
ahnaf is it worth reading all those books
we want to live the knowledge too live the content
ion
and the fake qualifier
i guess imagine a multimedia obsidian or notion that behaves according to some insane arcane rules that you can't ever really determine
nope. i only remember the leaves bristling behind the window during chemistry class
was it worth it
this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet
i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate
have you read
whats your name?
i hadn't considered this pedagogically or as a kind of personal knowledge management system (puke) at all but i suppose it is both of those things
its good
way too random but already engaging. i want to explore it
the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book
...
or never left