okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models
yeah people dont get it they assume its ahnaf
was it worth it
...
ahnaf is it worth reading all those books
not so on: yvf(wthw)
...
your feed looks like my tumblr
send link
stalgivc is the greatest poster of all time
all that is to say
autonomy of learning
as in
magnetisation/form
amazing hopefully this was all legible and frankly i might be going very off board but you seemed interesting
13 |
|
|
H |
|
|
. . . . |
. . . . |
. . . . |
. . . . |
|
Their voices are saying they haven't and shouldn't fuck but want to so bad, or have fucked and can't again but want to so bad, or something like that. Would this be easier if they were birds? Incel kind of question... I'm not following the conversation, but I'm still listening. He's talking in this slightly begging way. It's a way of talking that asks for pity, like he's already tried appealing to every other one of her sensibilities. Incel kind of observation... Maybe he just talks like that, in some upspeak derivative. Haha unless?
not their contents
so the method has to be autonomous
in a post. I want to be remembered
there's probably something in that, but I don't feel like thinking about it too much yet.
idk
barren land
i hadn't considered this pedagogically or as a kind of personal knowledge management system (puke) at all but i suppose it is both of those things
a heavy, heavy rain. a clear day.
I created this site
.this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.