we can only engage in such a way
your feed looks like my tumblr
ahnaf is it worth reading all those books
i don't really want to be associated with that one for some reason
you cannot feed someone truth
in a way what we are really interested in with pedagogy is the magnetisation
mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation
so the method has to be autonomous
all that is to say
what do you think my name is
god being the centre magnet
i want to do that too
okay im going very rogue and very inarticulate
to work in time to get to the timeless, perfection thru chaos
think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now
not their contents
nope. i only remember the leaves bristling behind the window during chemistry class
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
is everyoneback on tumblr now
yeah
bro i read nothing in my life
And thank you for telling me that the manner in which the narrator consistently fails to act morally is really compelling. Fuck you.
or never left
Thank you, Jack
plato
barren land
magnetisation basically means the induction of divine form unto you
amazing hopefully this was all legible and frankly i might be going very off board but you seemed interesting
like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them
we want to live the knowledge too live the content
i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate
i understand
much more tactility