much more tactility

so an active mazelike process

its good short few pages

amazing hopefully this was all legible and frankly i might be going very off board but you seemed interesting

is this you as well

i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying

what do you think my name is

thank you

its performative

plato

isaac newton

god "possessing" artists "possessing" people

not their contents

division of reality is straying away from it

i was tempted to lie about my name

so at the end

god being the centre magnet

we can only engage in such a way

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book

i dont understand magnetisation

so the method has to be autonomous

i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate

plato

all that is to say

ahnaf abrar

yeah

i understand

i really havent

have you read

its good

Hours staring at the ceiling, the wall, curling up into a ball. It seems annoyed with the light, it kind of recoils. It will get lighter. I wonder where it goes in the day.

ion