nope. i only remember the leaves bristling behind the window during chemistry class
think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now
you cannot feed someone truth
to work in time to get to the timeless, perfection thru chaos
so the method has to be autonomous
its performative
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation
in a way what we are really interested in with pedagogy is the magnetisation
so at the end
amazing hopefully this was all legible and frankly i might be going very off board but you seemed interesting
we want to live the knowledge too live the content
like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them
division of reality is straying away from it
okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models
barren land
i hope ai fixes this with the cessation of interfaces and walls
send your tumblr
so an active mazelike process
theres a kind of a cowardice to generative art that i want to avoid though. i want the kind of relationship to this thing that a game designer has to a game engine
it holds me to something (you, now). I love editing!
nope. i only remember the leaves bristling behind the window during chemistry class