okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models
And thank you for telling me that the manner in which the narrator consistently fails to act morally is really compelling. Fuck you.
is this you as well
we want to live the knowledge too live the content
i have read not even 1 book
what do you think my name is
my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given
propensity within someone
i hope ai fixes this with the cessation of interfaces and walls
lol yea
like first name
i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying
ahnaf is it worth reading all those books
all that is to say
think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now
i want to do that too
was it worth it
Sun, 23 Nov 2025 10:37:17
something for the future. something to look at when this is more. I've been thinking about... whatever
magnetisation/form
we need to be deconstructing our identities
no like which do people call me
your feed looks like my tumblr
feel you
ahnaf abrar
bro i read nothing in my life
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
abrar?
send your tumblr