a version of this existed for a few months last year but it was static. it was HTML with writing and pictures and videos and sounds. i had this feeling that the code should be as important as the content, that structurally each piece in relation to each other piece shouldn't change, that the mazelike quality should emerge from me intricately arranging paths through it. like classic hypertext
Their voices are saying they haven't and shouldn't fuck but want to so bad, or have fucked and can't again but want to so bad, or something like that. Would this be easier if they were birds? Incel kind of question... I'm not following the conversation, but I'm still listening. He's talking in this slightly begging way. It's a way of talking that asks for pity, like he's already tried appealing to every other one of her sensibilities. Incel kind of observation... Maybe he just talks like that, in some upspeak derivative. Haha unless?
it exists in my head in some way that i'm trying to get out i lied on my story a little bit because i'm mostly feeling it and thinking about it. feeling something deeply doesn't necessitate any kind of deep relevance or whatever but the thinking is useful
but i respect your search
Better Lift
thank you
mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation
the site i am dreaming
barren land
which magnetises chains of pins
lol
i love it here
isaac newton
amazing hopefully this was all legible and frankly i might be going very off board but you seemed interesting
ahnaf is it worth reading all those books
okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models
god "possessing" artists "possessing" people
i understand
think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now
you cannot feed someone truth
god being the centre magnet
Mon, 01 Dec 2025 23:38:15
division of reality is straying away from it
i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying
...
the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book
so the method has to be autonomous
ahnaf is it worth reading all those books
what do you mean
was it worth it