After thinking and forgetting and thinking and forgetting

i really havent

sorry i am texting like a slav

the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book

we can only engage in such a way

i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate

autonomy of learning

you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak

like first name

like magnets

mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation

lol

this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet

division of reality is straying away from it

i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying

i want to do that too

i really havent

ahnaf abrar

so the method has to be autonomous

isaac

its good

magnetisation basically means the induction of divine form unto you

lol yea

abrar?

its good short few pages

feel you

much more tactility

so magnetisation means the divine spirit acting thru u endowing you with its qualities

i guess imagine a multimedia obsidian or notion that behaves according to some insane arcane rules that you can't ever really determine

Thank you for telling me that I'm failing to see how I'm reproducing the dynamics I'm trying to critique by only describing my Korean colleague / fresh meat and the black girl in relation to others and myself.

"No, it'll get cold!"
"Put a tut ahh put a-"