not their contents

we can only engage in such a way

my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given

the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book

to work in time to get to the timeless, perfection thru chaos

yeah

propensity within someone

Mon, 03 Nov 2025 08:27:13

you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak

something religious, a kind of complex,

it will get lighter

One of the birds shoots out of the tree.

its performative

okay im going very rogue and very inarticulate

all that is to say

lol

mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation

your feed looks like my tumblr

we want to live the knowledge too live the content

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

a heavy, heavy rain. a clear day.

I created this site