is this you as well

Thank you, Jack

idk

to work in time to get to the timeless, perfection thru chaos

i have read not even 1 book

mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation

autonomy of learning

i understand

and the fake qualifier

lol yea

i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying

like magnets

all that is to say

ahnaf abrar

barren land

thank you

isaac newton

is everyoneback on tumblr now

so at the end

i hadn't considered this pedagogically or as a kind of personal knowledge management system (puke) at all but i suppose it is both of those things

like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them

i hope ai fixes this with the cessation of interfaces and walls

as in

feel you

you cannot feed someone truth

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate

send your tumblr

god being the centre magnet

its good

propensity within someone

your feed looks like my tumblr

okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models

think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now

...

send link

way too random but already engaging. i want to explore it

wait what is that