She says something that isn't really right but isn't really wrong. I'm not taking in their words any more, just their voices, trying to get a feel for whatever is going on between them. I'm imagining what it's like for them in this delicate situation, what I would say if it were me. She has that perfect upper-class accent, and she's using whatever upper-class tact that comes with it to navigate this. Style. They can't be together, but their voices are betraying them.

It Will Get Lighter

somewhere between instagram and chatgpt

I know that if I try to make this entry any more than it is I will ruin it.

Thu, 06 Nov 2025 23:18:46

abrar?

we can only engage in such a way

magnetisation basically means the induction of divine form unto you

much more tactility

isaac newton

so the method has to be autonomous

i love it here

so magnetisation means the divine spirit acting thru u endowing you with its qualities

in a way what we are really interested in with pedagogy is the magnetisation

isaac

mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation

god being the centre magnet

i understand

autonomy of learning

division of reality is straying away from it

magnetisation/form

i hope ai fixes this with the cessation of interfaces and walls

this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet

have you read

send your tumblr

its good

and the fake qualifier

propensity within someone

send link

Lift Analysis

nope. i only remember the leaves bristling behind the window during chemistry class

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

was it worth it

like first name