yeah

okay im going very rogue and very inarticulate

okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models

i did until you asked which kind of gave it away

think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now

what do you mean

i have read not even 1 book

i dont understand magnetisation

abrar?

i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate

propensity within someone

god "possessing" artists "possessing" people

you cannot feed someone truth

barren land

so an active mazelike process

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

its good short few pages

and the fake qualifier

whats your name?

i hadn't considered this pedagogically or as a kind of personal knowledge management system (puke) at all but i suppose it is both of those things

feel you

its good

lol

Imprint, memory, impact, representation, impression

your feed looks like my tumblr

stalgivc is the greatest poster of all time

plato

as in

It Will Get Lighter

to work in time to get to the timeless, perfection thru chaos

its good