like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them
that is unstable and lets me operate in that discovery mode that i can create within and also produce works from.
We stand there laughing. The fireworks go off behind him.
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
in a way what we are really interested in with pedagogy is the magnetisation
much more tactility
my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given
think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now
i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying
ion
sorry i am texting like a slav
its good short few pages
or never left
i am quite confused, not quite getting the idea of it
i understand
i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate
i did until you asked which kind of gave it away
i was tempted to lie about my name
i love to walk around and see things and take photos and go online and look at websites and click on links and take screenshots i love to surf and i love to browse
i am quite illiterate on producing technology