i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

I've found the girl, or she's found me, and we're smoking a cigarette while we watch the silhouettes of the French Raj and his fireworks bearer down on the bank.

i dont understand magnetisation

abrar?

like magnets

you cannot feed someone truth

feel you

is this you as well

like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them

as in

sorry i am texting like a slav

my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given

much more tactility

yeah

the site i am dreaming

way too random but already engaging. i want to explore it

we want to live the knowledge too live the content

was it worth it

idk

okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models

think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now

i sat down to eat my peasant dinner but i thought it was a song you sent so i didn’t watch it then

i don't really want to be associated with that one for some reason

send your tumblr

something for the future. something to look at when this is more. I've been thinking about... whatever

lol

plato

so an active mazelike process

"No, it'll get cold!"
"Put a tut ahh put a-"

wait what is that

i see a website

the textwall is as much for me as it is for you