like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them

you cannot feed someone truth

magnetisation/form

feel you

this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet

and the fake qualifier

you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak

so the method has to be autonomous

i really havent

abrar?

yeah people dont get it they assume its ahnaf

in a way what we are really interested in with pedagogy is the magnetisation

so at the end

i don't really want to be associated with that one for some reason

all that is to say

no like which do people call me

we need to be deconstructing our identities

Rain, starting

like first name

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

i want to do that too

and the fake qualifier

After thinking and forgetting and thinking and forgetting

i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate