like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them
you cannot feed someone truth
magnetisation/form
feel you
and the fake qualifier
you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak
so the method has to be autonomous
i really havent
abrar?
yeah people dont get it they assume its ahnaf
in a way what we are really interested in with pedagogy is the magnetisation
so at the end
i don't really want to be associated with that one for some reason
all that is to say
no like which do people call me
we need to be deconstructing our identities
like first name
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
i want to do that too
and the fake qualifier
After thinking and forgetting and thinking and forgetting
i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate