much more tactility

Thank you, Jack

in a way what we are really interested in with pedagogy is the magnetisation

plato

like first name

abrar?

we want to live the knowledge too live the content

what do you mean

amazing hopefully this was all legible and frankly i might be going very off board but you seemed interesting

that looks like my instagram account

mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation

isaac

think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now

and so on. not wanting the rhyming / clanging

...

its good

the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book

bro i read nothing in my life

its good short few pages

i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

ahnaf is it worth reading all those books

way too random but already engaging. i want to explore it

plato


We look out over the river to a block of luxury flats built on the site of some old docks. It would be nice to live right there. Yes.

so at the end

i dont understand magnetisation

i hadn't considered this pedagogically or as a kind of personal knowledge management system (puke) at all but i suppose it is both of those things