i struggle with building a personal technical architecture for storing media, both curation and creation. instead i bookmark everything
i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate
we need to be deconstructing our identities
its performative
god being the centre magnet
not their contents
like magnets
what do you mean
so an active mazelike process
fw
much more tactility
have you read
ion
no i haven't really read anything
mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation
its good
in a way what we are really interested in with pedagogy is the magnetisation
so magnetisation means the divine spirit acting thru u endowing you with its qualities
to work in time to get to the timeless, perfection thru chaos
yeah
what do you think my name is
god "possessing" artists "possessing" people
lol yea
sorry i am texting like a slav
i want to do that too
that looks like my instagram account
yeah
so at the end
i don't really want to be associated with that one for some reason
magnetisation/form
we want to live the knowledge too live the content
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
magnetisation basically means the induction of divine form unto you
i guess imagine a multimedia obsidian or notion that behaves according to some insane arcane rules that you can't ever really determine
isaac newton
as in