i did until you asked which kind of gave it away

as in

its performative

yeah people dont get it they assume its ahnaf

to work in time to get to the timeless, perfection thru chaos

this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet

my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given

i really havent

bro i read nothing in my life

ahnaf is it worth reading all those books

"No, it'll get cold!"
"Put a tut ahh put a-"

you cannot feed someone truth

abrar?

like first name

isaac

its good short few pages

mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation

so the method has to be autonomous

we can only engage in such a way

and the fake qualifier

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

...