like first name
mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
and the fake qualifier
god "possessing" artists "possessing" people
magnetisation basically means the induction of divine form unto you
my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given
have you read
lol yea
lol
yeah
okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models
is this you as well
its good short few pages
division of reality is straying away from it
so the method has to be autonomous
okay im going very rogue and very inarticulate
idk
i love it here
ahnaf abrar
its performative
like magnets
This is a website run by a narcissist who can't produce anything without the hope that it is seen and loved but can't act due to the fear of it being seen and hated. They immediately feel the need to ask Jack GPT to define whatever this feeling is in the hope that understanding it will mean control over it and control over it will mean that they can stop it.
its good
you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak
its good
was it worth it