nope. i only remember the leaves bristling behind the window during chemistry class

so at the end

ahnaf is it worth reading all those books

okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models

this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet

stalgivc is the greatest poster of all time

you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak

what do you mean

god "possessing" artists "possessing" people

One of the birds shoots out of the tree.

you cannot feed someone truth

not their contents

like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them

something religious, a kind of complex,

it will get lighter

i hope ai fixes this with the cessation of interfaces and walls

my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

the textwall is as much for me as it is for you

its good

so the method has to be autonomous

i love it here

no i haven't really read anything

lol

plato

okay im going very rogue and very inarticulate

so an active mazelike process

in a way what we are really interested in with pedagogy is the magnetisation

which magnetises chains of pins

i don't really want to be associated with that one for some reason