there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

you cannot feed someone truth

wow, you are the first stranger to write a textwall to me

hiding from the rain

She says something that isn't really right but isn't really wrong. I'm not taking in their words any more, just their voices, trying to get a feel for whatever is going on between them. I'm imagining what it's like for them in this delicate situation, what I would say if it were me. She has that perfect upper-class accent, and she's using whatever upper-class tact that comes with it to navigate this. Style. They can't be together, but their voices are betraying them.

Picture

its performative

but it is in my head and am i compelled to realise it, so it is my silmarillion, my tempelos

propensity within someone

we can only engage in such a way

not their contents

The bird dives back into the tree. It shakes, some leaves fall.

division of reality is straying away from it

so the method has to be autonomous

i am quite confused, not quite getting the idea of it

i struggle with building a personal technical architecture for storing media, both curation and creation. instead i bookmark everything

I'm trying to picture the scene inside, like I was trying to picture the scene in the tree.

the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book

somewhere between instagram and chatgpt

After thinking and forgetting and thinking and forgetting