we need to be deconstructing our identities

so an active mazelike process

division of reality is straying away from it

like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them

you cannot feed someone truth

not their contents

propensity within someone

all that is to say

mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation

okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models

so the method has to be autonomous

i am quite illiterate on producing technology

the point of this was to try and avoid this narcissistic death spiral I'm in by acting anonymously and impulsively. how can that feeling that even Jack can't describe paralyse me if my name isn't next to any of this? the excitement of believing I just need a new process has overcome me and I have cummed out an empty webpage.


there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

its good

which magnetises chains of pins

in a post. I want to be remembered

plato

in a way what we are really interested in with pedagogy is the magnetisation

I wonder if the birds knew I was watching?


like magnets

and the fake qualifier

its performative

Above and behind a window opens and a cigarette hangs out.

ion

ahnaf abrar

my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given