After thinking and forgetting and thinking and forgetting
it exists in my head in some way that i'm trying to get out i lied on my story a little bit because i'm mostly feeling it and thinking about it. feeling something deeply doesn't necessitate any kind of deep relevance or whatever but the thinking is useful
you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak
and the fake qualifier
isaac newton
ahnaf abrar
think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now
was it worth it
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
its performative
so at the end
like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them
ahnaf is it worth reading all those books
i did until you asked which kind of gave it away
barren land
autonomy of learning
bro i read nothing in my life
this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet
i have read not even 1 book
in a post. I want to be remembered
It's
dusk
in a snowy forest and I'm playing with a fox.