okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models
have you read
autonomy of learning
ahnaf is it worth reading all those books
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
division of reality is straying away from it
abrar?
like first name
what do you think my name is
in a way what we are really interested in with pedagogy is the magnetisation
no i haven't really read anything
my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given
you cannot feed someone truth
to work in time to get to the timeless, perfection thru chaos
all that is to say
this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet
like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them
Can I see
so the method has to be autonomous
i don't really want to be associated with that one for some reason
with this post net clarity and the hours of nothing that followed I realise this is going to be awful.
Thu, 06 Nov 2025 23:18:46
and the fake qualifier
...