not their contents
...
whats your name?
all that is to say
i was tempted to lie about my name
this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet
we want to live the knowledge too live the content
i love it here
okay im going very rogue and very inarticulate
idk
fw
my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given
its good
its performative
we can only engage in such a way
and the fake qualifier
like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them
isaac
After thinking and forgetting and thinking and forgetting
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
in a way what we are really interested in with pedagogy is the magnetisation
It's
dusk
in a snowy forest and I'm playing with a fox.