a lot of what i've been doing has been some imaginary screenshot or recording of his website, something that could be found within it
so at the end
okay im going very rogue and very inarticulate
yeah
not their contents
much more tactility
mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation
amazing hopefully this was all legible and frankly i might be going very off board but you seemed interesting
fw
i hadn't considered this pedagogically or as a kind of personal knowledge management system (puke) at all but i suppose it is both of those things
we want to live the knowledge too live the content
we can only engage in such a way
barren land
division of reality is straying away from it
so the method has to be autonomous
so an active mazelike process
i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying
i struggle with building a personal technical architecture for storing media, both curation and creation. instead i bookmark everything
i want to do that too
the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book
and the fake qualifier