so at the end

think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now

its good

i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate

its good short few pages

that looks like my instagram account

i have read not even 1 book

what do you mean

so the method has to be autonomous

fw

no i haven't really read anything

its good

to work in time to get to the timeless, perfection thru chaos

division of reality is straying away from it

so magnetisation means the divine spirit acting thru u endowing you with its qualities

we can only engage in such a way

yeah people dont get it they assume its ahnaf

is this you as well

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

much more tactility

feel you

nope. i only remember the leaves bristling behind the window during chemistry class

all that is to say

the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book

okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models

have you read