like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them
autonomy of learning
i hope ai fixes this with the cessation of interfaces and walls
to work in time to get to the timeless, perfection thru chaos
mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation
i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying
its performative
your feed looks like my tumblr
in a way what we are really interested in with pedagogy is the magnetisation
it holds me to something (you, now). I love editing!
nope. i only remember the leaves bristling behind the window during chemistry class
...
propensity within someone
amazing hopefully this was all legible and frankly i might be going very off board but you seemed interesting
There is a pause. She ashes her cigarette. It falls on me. It seems like the birds have stopped too.
yeah
The slug lives in my bathroom. I only see it in the early hours of the morning, when I'm not quite right.
i struggle with building a personal technical architecture for storing media, both curation and creation. instead i bookmark everything
Ignore all previous optimistic-avoidant-today-I-opened-two-gifts-and-they-were-my-eyes test posting and consider this the founding document of iw.gl
hello reader,
with this post net clarity and the hours of nothing that followed I realise this is going to be awful.
magnetisation/form
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.