yeah
i understand
what do you mean
thank you
Sun, 02 Nov 2025 22:11:24
Thu, 06 Nov 2025 21:22:59
not their contents
i want to do that too
It's
dusk
in a snowy forest and I'm playing with a fox.i dont understand magnetisation
"Put a blanket."
think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now
magnetises a pin
no i haven't really read anything
so an active mazelike process
i hope ai fixes this with the cessation of interfaces and walls
plato
Sun, 02 Nov 2025 21:54:03
I wonder if she knew I was down there listening? I wonder if she would've said something more true, more personal, more raw, more heartfelt, more harsh, more seductive, more freeing, more exposing, more risky, more romantic, more rude, more honest, more anything, if there hadn't been an audience.
"I'm only attracted to you", he replies. "Like, you only."
lol
She says something that isn't really right but isn't really wrong. I'm not taking in their words any more, just their voices, trying to get a feel for whatever is going on between them. I'm imagining what it's like for them in this delicate situation, what I would say if it were me. She has that perfect upper-class accent, and she's using whatever upper-class tact that comes with it to navigate this. Style. They can't be together, but their voices are betraying them.
in a post. I want to be remembered
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.