feel you
okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models
no like which do people call me
god being the centre magnet
i guess imagine a multimedia obsidian or notion that behaves according to some insane arcane rules that you can't ever really determine
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
we need to be deconstructing our identities
so the method has to be autonomous
send link
as in
ahnaf is it worth reading all those books
its good
bro i read nothing in my life
my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given
this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet
its good
magnetisation/form
i really havent
the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book
plato
propensity within someone
They're fucking around with the box. I ask her what people do with fireworks for so long before they're ready to light. She doesn't know.
i struggle with building a personal technical architecture for storing media, both curation and creation. instead i bookmark everything
We gather around the start of a causeway down to the Thames. It's a pretty cold night and there's a breeze coming off the river.
kind of mythopoesis
was it worth it