not so on: yvf(wthw)

feel you

okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models

no like which do people call me

god being the centre magnet

i guess imagine a multimedia obsidian or notion that behaves according to some insane arcane rules that you can't ever really determine

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

we need to be deconstructing our identities

so the method has to be autonomous

like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them

It Will Get Lighter

send link

as in

ahnaf is it worth reading all those books

its good

bro i read nothing in my life

ion

my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given

this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet

its good

magnetisation/form

i really havent

the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book

plato

propensity within someone

They're fucking around with the box. I ask her what people do with fireworks for so long before they're ready to light. She doesn't know.

i struggle with building a personal technical architecture for storing media, both curation and creation. instead i bookmark everything

We gather around the start of a causeway down to the Thames. It's a pretty cold night and there's a breeze coming off the river.

kind of mythopoesis

was it worth it