there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
god "possessing" artists "possessing" people
its good
i really havent
like magnets
and the fake qualifier
i struggle with building a personal technical architecture for storing media, both curation and creation. instead i bookmark everything
i dont understand magnetisation
magnetises a pin
we can only engage in such a way
much more tactility
ahnaf is it worth reading all those books
send link
Hours staring at the ceiling, the wall, curling up into a ball. It seems annoyed with the light, it kind of recoils. It will get lighter. I wonder where it goes in the day.
autonomy of learning
whats your name?
mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation
i have read not even 1 book
isaac newton
ion
13 | | | H | | | . . . . | . . . . | . . . . | . . . . | |
amazing hopefully this was all legible and frankly i might be going very off board but you seemed interesting