think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now
the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book
i hope ai fixes this with the cessation of interfaces and walls
we want to live the knowledge too live the content
amazing hopefully this was all legible and frankly i might be going very off board but you seemed interesting
okay im going very rogue and very inarticulate
i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying
as in
so an active mazelike process
autonomy of learning
i hadn't considered this pedagogically or as a kind of personal knowledge management system (puke) at all but i suppose it is both of those things
what do you mean
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
its good
its good short few pages
i understand
isaac
ion
you cannot feed someone truth
all that is to say
magnetisation basically means the induction of divine form unto you
i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate
its good
so magnetisation means the divine spirit acting thru u endowing you with its qualities
so at the end
Can I see
Thu, 06 Nov 2025 23:18:46