...
i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate
so the method has to be autonomous
is everyoneback on tumblr now
or never left
okay im going very rogue and very inarticulate
its good
magnetisation basically means the induction of divine form unto you
my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given
i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying
i struggle with building a personal technical architecture for storing media, both curation and creation. instead i bookmark everything
this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet
yeah
mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation
what do you mean
that looks like my instagram account
i have read not even 1 book
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
i guess imagine a multimedia obsidian or notion that behaves according to some insane arcane rules that you can't ever really determine
i love it here
no like which do people call me
plato
what do you think my name is
which magnetises chains of pins
god being the centre magnet
i dont understand magnetisation
so magnetisation means the divine spirit acting thru u endowing you with its qualities
is this you as well
Sun, 02 Nov 2025 21:54:03