magnetisation basically means the induction of divine form unto you
its performative
so the method has to be autonomous
to work in time to get to the timeless, perfection thru chaos
like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them
yeah
autonomy of learning
propensity within someone
think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now
plato
okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models
god being the centre magnet
what do you think my name is
ion
i see a website though something that reconfigures or is mazelike
so magnetisation means the divine spirit acting thru u endowing you with its qualities
and the fake qualifier
i got bored though because i knew all of the different arrangements of it. i probably needed to stick at it longer to get it dense enough to feel navigable in a way that was engaging to me
all that is to say
abrar?
Mon, 03 Nov 2025 08:38:49
plato
mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given
Sun, 02 Nov 2025 22:11:24