all that is to say
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
its good short few pages
ahnaf is it worth reading all those books
autonomy of learning
i was tempted to lie about my name
ahnaf abrar
feel you
i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate
amazing hopefully this was all legible and frankly i might be going very off board but you seemed interesting
yeah
we need to be deconstructing our identities
is this you as well
no like which do people call me
i don't really want to be associated with that one for some reason
i see a website though something that reconfigures or is mazelike
abrar?
we want to live the knowledge too live the content
you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak
something religious, a kind of complex,
it will get lighter
, something washing, cleansing, revealing, etc.i guess imagine a multimedia obsidian or notion that behaves according to some insane arcane rules that you can't ever really determine
magnetises a pin
"No, it'll get cold!"
"Put a tut ahh put a-"
a lot of what i've been doing has been some imaginary screenshot or recording of his website, something that could be found within it