there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
stalgivc is the greatest poster of all time
what do you think my name is
so the method has to be autonomous
plato
no like which do people call me
barren land
i hadn't considered this pedagogically or as a kind of personal knowledge management system (puke) at all but i suppose it is both of those things
its good short few pages
i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying
much more tactility
idk
its good
i struggle with building a personal technical architecture for storing media, both curation and creation. instead i bookmark everything
all that is to say
and the fake qualifier
we can only engage in such a way
i guess imagine a multimedia obsidian or notion that behaves according to some insane arcane rules that you can't ever really determine
you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak
Thu, 06 Nov 2025 23:18:46
like first name
so an active mazelike process