i understand

think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now

so the method has to be autonomous

okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models

all that is to say

ahnaf is it worth reading all those books

was it worth it

the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book

i have read not even 1 book

we can only engage in such a way

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

plato

you cannot feed someone truth

is everyoneback on tumblr now

i did until you asked which kind of gave it away

wait what is that

i really havent

in a post. I want to be remembered

like magnets

i love it here

i really havent

it holds me to something (you, now). I love editing!

Wed, 11 Nov 2025 21:12:41

Thu, 06 Nov 2025 23:18:46

something religious, a kind of complex,

it will get lighter

i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying

Slug