there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
that looks like my instagram account
lol yea
ahnaf is it worth reading all those books
division of reality is straying away from it
my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given
you know who you are. no more time, not like
1
. way too specific.was it worth it
its performative
...
have you read
wait what is that
Hours staring at the ceiling, the wall, curling up into a ball. It seems annoyed with the light, it kind of recoils. It will get lighter. I wonder where it goes in the day.
the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book
as in
what do you mean
...
abrar?
bro i read nothing in my life
autonomy of learning
i hope ai fixes this with the cessation of interfaces and walls
...
not so on: yvf(wthw)
its good short few pages
your feed looks like my tumblr
okay im going very rogue and very inarticulate