i struggle with building a personal technical architecture for storing media, both curation and creation. instead i bookmark everything
i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying
not their contents
this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet
have you read
like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them
your feed looks like my tumblr
or never left
yeah
in a way what we are really interested in with pedagogy is the magnetisation
think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now
i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate
i guess imagine a multimedia obsidian or notion that behaves according to some insane arcane rules that you can't ever really determine
propensity within someone
all that is to say
you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak
we can only engage in such a way
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
you cannot feed someone truth
division of reality is straying away from it
Mon, 03 Nov 2025 08:27:13
so at the end
but really the thing should be autonomous
plato
Better Lift
i hadn't considered this pedagogically or as a kind of personal knowledge management system (puke) at all but i suppose it is both of those things
It's
dusk
in a snowy forest and I'm playing with a fox.