all that is to say
think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now
idk
stalgivc is the greatest poster of all time
i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate
amazing hopefully this was all legible and frankly i might be going very off board but you seemed interesting
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
ion
we can only engage in such a way
like first name
so the method has to be autonomous
feel you
i hadn't considered this pedagogically or as a kind of personal knowledge management system (puke) at all but i suppose it is both of those things
you cannot feed someone truth
like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them
this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet
i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying
was it worth it
like magnets
i really havent
ahnaf abrar
what do you think my name is
god being the centre magnet
i was tempted to lie about my name
sorry i am texting like a slav
is this you as well
i understand
in a way what we are really interested in with pedagogy is the magnetisation
is everyoneback on tumblr now
much more tactility