we can only engage in such a way

so an active mazelike process

so the method has to be autonomous

i hadn't considered this pedagogically or as a kind of personal knowledge management system (puke) at all but i suppose it is both of those things

i guess imagine a multimedia obsidian or notion that behaves according to some insane arcane rules that you can't ever really determine

as in

stalgivc is the greatest poster of all time

not so on: yvf(wthw)

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

autonomy of learning

propensity within someone

mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation

send link

was it worth it

i hope ai fixes this with the cessation of interfaces and walls

yeah

Lift Analysis

my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given

it holds me to something (you, now). I love editing!

...

you cannot feed someone truth

hello reader,

i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate

yes

a heavy, heavy rain. a clear day.

I created this site

much more tactility

"Put a blanket."

I Write Goodbye Letter