Sun, 23 Nov 2025 10:37:17

mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation

think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now

not their contents

i don't really want to be associated with that one for some reason

as in

whats your name?

i was tempted to lie about my name

its good

the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book

no i haven't really read anything

propensity within someone

what do you mean

in a way what we are really interested in with pedagogy is the magnetisation

its good

magnetisation/form

plato

ion

its good short few pages

you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak

feel you

i love it here

was it worth it

idk

or never left

lol yea

bro i read nothing in my life

is this you as well

...

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

i believe search always should be immersive, because whatever is pre planned and non consuming (what you are looking for is total engulfment by the spectre of the real), a joyous intensity, a flow of virtue