Sun, 23 Nov 2025 10:37:17

like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them

we can only engage in such a way

not their contents

propensity within someone

okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models

nope. i only remember the leaves bristling behind the window during chemistry class

its performative

i guess imagine a multimedia obsidian or notion that behaves according to some insane arcane rules that you can't ever really determine

so an active mazelike process

ahnaf is it worth reading all those books

not so on: yvf(wthw)

i don't really want to be associated with that one for some reason

i really havent

way too random but already engaging. i want to explore it

its good

...

and the fake qualifier

so at the end

wait what is that

Above and behind a window opens and a cigarette hangs out.

I'm trying to picture the scene inside, like I was trying to picture the scene in the tree.

much more tactility

One of the birds shoots out of the tree.

magnetises a pin

The bird dives back into the tree. It shakes, some leaves fall.

with this post net clarity and the hours of nothing that followed I realise this is going to be awful.

"Anyway, you're you. I mean, look at you!" she says. "You could get with anyone, anyone in the street. Really."

theres a kind of a cowardice to generative art that i want to avoid though. i want the kind of relationship to this thing that a game designer has to a game engine

plato