think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now

idk

amazing hopefully this was all legible and frankly i might be going very off board but you seemed interesting

i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate

we want to live the knowledge too live the content

i guess imagine a multimedia obsidian or notion that behaves according to some insane arcane rules that you can't ever really determine

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

god "possessing" artists "possessing" people

you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak

its good

stalgivc is the greatest poster of all time

ion

magnetisation/form

we need to be deconstructing our identities

like first name

i did until you asked which kind of gave it away

its performative

i don't really want to be associated with that one for some reason

hello reader,

wait what is that

yeah

ahnaf is it worth reading all those books

and the fake qualifier

this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet

whats your name?

it holds me to something (you, now). I love editing!

as in