ion

okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models

no i haven't really read anything

i struggle with building a personal technical architecture for storing media, both curation and creation. instead i bookmark everything

so the method has to be autonomous

which magnetises chains of pins

i understand

sorry i am texting like a slav

this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet

is everyoneback on tumblr now

mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation

propensity within someone

its good

magnetisation basically means the induction of divine form unto you

i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate

so an active mazelike process

god being the centre magnet

my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given

god "possessing" artists "possessing" people

stalgivc is the greatest poster of all time

its good short few pages

Rain, starting

amazing hopefully this was all legible and frankly i might be going very off board but you seemed interesting

Sun, 23 Nov 2025 10:37:17

much more tactility

Mon, 03 Nov 2025 08:38:49

division of reality is straying away from it

okay im going very rogue and very inarticulate

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

so magnetisation means the divine spirit acting thru u endowing you with its qualities

currently