not so on: yvf(wthw)

i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate

magnetisation/form

this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet

propensity within someone

its performative

you cannot feed someone truth

ahnaf is it worth reading all those books

you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak

i dont understand magnetisation

so the method has to be autonomous

what do you mean

its good short few pages

autonomy of learning

my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given

no i haven't really read anything

...

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

We stand there laughing. The fireworks go off behind him.

division of reality is straying away from it